Two Way Hard Three | Las Vegas Casino & Design Blog
May 25, 2008
LVRJ - Las Vegas Sands Must Pay $43M In Macau Dispute
Posted by HunterLooks like Richard Suen, the Chinese businessman that supposedly helped Las Vegas Sands setup their contacts in Macau will get a pay day after all.
A Las Vegas jury awarded him $43 million in damages. The company will appeal.
http://www.lvrj.com/news/19245874.html
Search
Categories
- About Vegas (38)
- ARIA (21)
- Atlantic City (49)
- Bellagio (90)
- Books (10)
- Boyd Gaming (57)
- Business of Gaming (870)
- Caesars/Harrah's (130)
- Casino Design (369)
- Casino Design Photo of the Week (12)
- CityCenter (158)
- Columbia Sussex (11)
- Condo-Hotels (15)
- Cosmopolitan (20)
- Detroit Casinos (10)
- Device Manufacturers and Games (6)
- Downtown Las Vegas (71)
- Dr. Dave Schwartz (68)
- Fontainebleau (30)
- Gaming Numbers (8)
- Genting (2)
- Interviews (13)
- iPhone (43)
- Landry's (1)
- Las Vegas Photography (98)
- Las Vegas Strip (740)
- Las Vegas/Casino History (3)
- Linq (4)
- Macau Casinos and Hotels (164)
- MGM Resorts International (418)
- Monte Carlo Fire (5)
- Online Gaming (2)
- Open Topics (20)
- Palazzo (59)
- Paolo Mello (1)
- Planet Hollywood (10)
- Podcasts (149)
- Poker (11)
- Press Releases (19)
- RateVegas.com (111)
- Reader Questions (3)
- Reader Reviews (54)
- Simpson on Vegas (38)
- SLS Las Vegas (2)
- Station Casinos (49)
- Strip Walk (32)
- Stripping (Reviews) (13)
- Travel (1)
- Trip Reports (95)
- Tropicana (4)
- Vegas Gang Podcast (115)
- Vegas Internet Mafia Picnic (7)
- Vegas Mate (21)
- Vegas Tips (9)
- Vegas Uncorked (6)
- VegasDelivered.com (1)
- Venetian/LV Sands (198)
- Video (9)
- Wynn Resorts (396)
Subscribe
- Grab our RSS Feed.
New to RSS? Learn more...
Recent Comments
- All Recent Comments on one page.
- mike_ch recently commented "I read the title. $48? I can picture Shelton reaching between his couch cus..." in LVRJ - Las Vegas Sands Must Pay $43M In Macau Dispute
Archives
- January 2018
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
Comments
I read the title. $48? I can picture Shelton reaching between his couch cushions for change.
Oh, $43m. Makes more sense.